Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2" Results 1 - 20 of 2,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 5:15 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-16 Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-00370-JVB-APR File Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Plaintiff: Patrick Collins, Inc. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm by Ray Beckerman
John Does 1-45, Doe #41 has filed a motion to sever John Does 2-45, dismiss the complaint as to them, and quash the related subpoenas.Notice of MotionMemorandum of LawDoe #41 DeclarationMorlan Ty Rogers Affidavit var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
On June 2, 2009, Zynga brought a trademark infringement suit against John Does 1-5. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
The judge went on to note, as a preface, that Uberhas demonstrated the following: (1) John Doe I is a real person who may be sued in federal court; (2) it has unsuccessfully attempted to identify John Doe I before filing this motion; (3) its claims against John Doe I could withstand a motion to dismiss; and (4) there is a reasonable likelihood that the proposed subpoena will lead to information identifying John… [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:53 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-37, has severed as to all defendants except John Doe #1, and granted discovery as to John Doe #1.Report and recommendation severing as to John Does 2-11Order granting discovery as to John Doe #1 only[Ed. note. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3, John Does 4-10, Ustream TV Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
Michel Pierson Holdings: (1) The conversion of preferred stock to cash in connection with a cash-out merger does not violate the redemption provisions of the preferred stock, when the transaction at issue does not constitute a redemption. (2) The conversion of preferred stock to cash in connection with a cash-out merger does not violate the provisions of the preferred stock that establish a limitation upon the right of preferred stockholders to… [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes the allegations: Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 allege that when they were thirteen years old they were solicited and recruited for sex trafficking and manipulated into providing to a third-party sex trafficker pornographic videos (“the Videos”) of themselves through the social media platform Snapchat. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by MBettman
Court of Appeals Decision The Eighth District Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision authored by Judge Tim McCormack, joined by Judge Eileen A. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 3:23 am
The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]